Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Exactly after I do the regular extraction of the archive, the file I get is: chromium-browser-stable-87.04280.67-1. I see that the .deb extension is missing but I tried in any case to give the command: sudo dpkg -i chromium-browser-stable-87.04280.67-1 and he gives me an error with the words: error: the chromium archive -browser-stable-87.04280.67-1 is not a normal file. I also tried to give the classic sudo apt-get install chromium-browser-stable-87.04280.67-1 but again nothing. What do you think am I wrong and what command exactly does it take to install this chromium package on Debian? I think that with this command I do, it doesn't work because it wants .deb extensions and I don't have it on this archive so I think it takes another command ...
2
Applications and Porting / Re: Blender on Talos II and Fedora Workstation
« Last post by tle on Today at 06:51:49 am »
If there are source code, I think you could give it a try to see if you could compile the engine.
3
Yesterday I discovered that the blender engine cycles is an addon that can be deactivated or activated at will. In fact, on the Power version of Blender this addon is missing. The sources exist, so I don't know if there is any specific problem in compiling the addon for our machines.
5
Applications and Porting / Re: Chromium and Ungoogled Chromium DNF Repository
« Last post by MauryG5 on April 21, 2021, 06:43:39 am »
Great job as always TLE, as soon as I can I update.  The exact error I don't remember, I can try again to give the command and see what happens with this new version.  If it still gives me error I will post the exact output of what happens ...
7
Applications and Porting / Re: Chromium and Ungoogled Chromium DNF Repository
« Last post by tle on April 21, 2021, 05:21:51 am »
Yes of course, in practice I download the tarball with Chromium, when I decompress the file, he extracts the file but does it without any extension and apparently this is a problem because if I try to install with the sudo dpkg command, it does not accept it and it gives me error. I tried to look for guides on how to install but unfortunately without success because it always gave me a pat that is no longer present or obsolete. Of course now this is new and I haven't tried to decompress it yet but I wanted to know before acting, if there is any particular command to use or something else to install ...

What is the exact error?
8
Operating Systems and Porting / Re: Fedora 33 LTS 5.10.x kernel RPMs
« Last post by sharkcz on April 21, 2021, 04:10:39 am »
So at least some good news after the recent fixes :-)
9
Operating Systems and Porting / Re: [NEWS] FreeBSD 13 is out
« Last post by Raion on April 19, 2021, 01:28:01 pm »
FINALLY el support.
10
Applications and Porting / Re: MAME for Power
« Last post by MauryG5 on April 17, 2021, 04:02:35 pm »
Guys then, I found on the web this RPM source of mame that seems to be version 0.229 for PPC64le. But if i try to install it, it asks me besides some libraries, also the package called "mame-data.229 but i don't find this package anywhere. I found also the 197 version but I have the same problem, I can't find the package mame-data, that are the repositories that mame needs to be able to work. I've tried to run the command "dnf install mame-data" as a site recommends but it doesn't find anything unfortunately... I would like to understand at this point if this dependencies package exists or not... But if it doesn't exist, how come there is this source 229.rpm for our architecture?

The link where I found those sources: https://www.rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=mame%28ppc-64%29+data&submit=Cerca+...+&system=&arch=
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10