Swiss finance regulator FINMA deputy CEO resigns, collateral damage from Debian?

[pocock]

When the Debianists first attacked the Software Freedom Institute in November 2021, I asked the legal insurance provider to assist me.  They failed to do their job.  I only publish this here because other people have raised questions about judgments.  In fact, there was no valid judgment.  In the absence of legal insurance, I simply canceled the trademark and neutralized the dispute.

If there are legal fees to be paid or reimbursed, the money should have been paid by the insurance company.

Moreover, I was able to prove the financial regulator knew about deficiencies in the illegal legal insurance scheme for a very long time.

I published the most compelling evidence between January 2025 and March 2025 on the site JuristGate.com.  Not only did the regulator fail to protect the public but it looks like they even took an active role in the cover up too.

The head of insurance supervision, who was also deputy head of FINMA, resigned after I put the emphasis on the cover-up.  They did not provide a reason for the resignation.  So I simply published the sequence of events and I let people draw their own conclusions about whether she resigned due to the way I reverse engineered a cover-up.

MIT DEDP MicroMasters online learner's blog post about cover-up linked to resignation of Swiss financial regulator

[TimKelly]

Daniel, you keep locking threads after you post, preventing anyone from discussing it with you.  You also seem to have a habit of characterizing those discussions as "lies" when the person presents contrary evidence.  If you are going to advocate for free speech, don't shut it down when others present information that disputes your positions.

I do find it disingenuous that you were raising the issue of Google "astroturfing" when you characterize yourself as a "Debian developer," or had until this most recent post, and that you were forced to turn over dozens of domains that used the Debian name in them.  That might lead one to think you are associated with Debian, but are not.  Perhaps not the same as astroturfing, but deceptive none-the-less.

I am concerned about the obsession you have with Debian.  It seems extremely unhealthy and likely fills you with negative energy, affecting your health, and perhaps your loved ones as well.  I believe you would do better by creating the world you want to see, instead of trying to destroy the one others have built.  In the case of Debian, I see nothing but a sincere effort to create an inclusive and supportive community that welcomes diversity.  That certainly is a world I would want to see.

If you must campaign against injustice, and some people are compelled to, I do not think Debian is an embodiment of evil, unlike the persons controlling Executive Branch of the U.S. government and in other countries.  You should raise your voice against the institutional corruption practiced daily by the President of the most powerful country in the world.  There are many other organizations who do much greater harm to the world than Debian, even if one were to contemplate that perhaps they do (I do not).  Your focus could reveal the inherent corruption in authoritarian governments with close ties to large corporations that profit from such arrangements.

I do hope you find help for your needs, and I also hope that you see that many vulnerable people may be drawn into your efforts.  It is unfortunate that the far-right uses such vulnerabilities in people to try to find new recruits.  It seems that hate hates being alone, and I hope that is not your motivation.

tim
 

[pocock]

If you are going to advocate for free speech, don't shut it down when others present information that disputes your positions.

You spoke and then you spoke the same thing again.  The first time you say something it is free speech but if you repeat it over again in two other threads it is a waste of disk space.

I do find it disingenuous that you were raising the issue of Google "astroturfing" when you characterize yourself as a "Debian developer,"

I resigned from some voluntary activities at a time when I lost two family members.  That does not make me any less of a Debian Developer.  Anybody insisting on putting their petty crusades over the privacy of my family is less than a real human though.

That might lead one to think you are associated with Debian, but are not.  Perhaps not the same as astroturfing, but deceptive none-the-less.

Copyright law says I'm associated with Debian until 70 years after I die.  Anybody telling you otherwise is deceiving you about copyright.

I am concerned about the obsession you have with Debian.  It seems ...

If a woman says no to sex, do you say the woman has an obsession with virginity?

They are imposing upon the privacy of my family.  My family and I did not consent to discussions about abuse.  To start such a discussion at a time of grief is even more obscene.

As long as they violate that privacy, it is like a rape in progress.  The obsession is not on my part.  They unilaterally imposed this upon my family.