Censorship pressure on Raptor, messages missing

[TimKelly]

Have you ever paid any open source developers for the work we do?

Yes.

Are you writing and publishing any code yourself?

Yes. 

http://www.dialectronics.com/

Also, for Raptor-specific aspects, please see

https://wiki.raptorcs.com/wiki/Installing_Big-endian_FreeBSD

https://wiki.raptorcs.com/wiki/From_QEMU_to_BigEndian_FreeBSD

https://wiki.raptorcs.com/wiki/SMT_profiling_with_Debian_and_perf

Plus my threads on trying to port the firmware for Raptor systems to other platforms.

https://forums.raptorcs.com/index.php/topic,632.0.html

Or you only contribute medical advice?

I do a lot of research into medical issues, as part of personal and professional interests.  I combine computational efforts with medical analysis.  You can see some of my computational efforts at

http://dm.mpjanson.org:8100/

You might want to brush up on compartmental models of infectious diseases, particularly vector-host models, before using the tool.  However, for a quick and simple demonstration, select SISIR and SEISIR, then select Time (should already be selected), and then select Infected vectors.

You will get a real-time generated output, and you can change the parameters on the left and get images in real-time (not stored).  The computational platform is a Udoo x86 Advanced SBC, consuming 12 watts, running Minix 3.1.6, which I ported to the Udoo x86 after building my own toolchain with pcc and yasm, plus my own code to shim between yasm's XDF object file output and Minix's ACK linker.  The images are generated with libjpeg.  I haven't published the disease modeling code, which I wrote using Sundials from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories (which I also ported to Minix). I am 100% BSD/MIT-licensed (0% GPL code).  If I see someone with a genuine interest in this effort, I will provide the source code, but I won't respond to your immediate demand that I do so as proof of my sincerity.

Now, Daniel, do you spent any time contributing to open source efforts in a manner that does not seek to tear down what others have created?

[pocock]

Now, Daniel, do you spent any time contributing to open source efforts in a manner that does not seek to tear down what others have created?

What am I tearing down when I documented the cases of volunteers being tricked to join the fake FSFE instead of the real FSF?

If you did so much work yourself, why do you think tricking people to give time and money to fake FSFE is acceptable?

[TimKelly]

What am I tearing down when I documented the cases of volunteers being tricked to join the fake FSFE instead of the real FSF?

If you did so much work yourself, why do you think tricking people to give time and money to fake FSFE is acceptable?

You didn't answer my question.  You rarely do.  When the conversation begins to focus on you, and you can not redirect with "What about" arguments, you close the thread.

Here, a simple example for you to follow:

https://marc.info/?l=pcc-commit-list&w=2&r=1&s=Tim+Kelly&q=b

It will return a list of commits to pcc as a result of my patches.  Please post a similar search of your recent contributions to an open-source effort.

[pocock]

When the conversation begins to focus on you,

so you admit stalking me

[TimKelly]

When the conversation begins to focus on you,

so you admit stalking me

Troll.

But yes, I read your blog (you do want people to do that, right?), I researched the issues you raised, and I examined your posts closely.  I find that the readers need to be aware that (in my opinion) your conclusions are not supported and the readers need to think for themselves before getting outraged and joining your crusade, or in any way having their opinions influenced by you.