Author Topic: Open source aspirations of credibility exploited to legitimize Bitcoin  (Read 82 times)

pocock

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 337
  • Karma: +34/-3
    • View Profile

Free / Open source is not absolutely perfect or secure but many people feel it gives a better hope of security and independence than proprietary software.

Over many years, proponents of Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency have tried to align themselves with open source developers and well known projects or organisations.

Many people have remained neutral about this topic up to now.  Recent news reports talk about a "death spiral" or "crypto winter" after the BTC price crash.

Does anybody feel projects should do more to distance themselves from Bitcoin?

Could Linux distributions be legally liable for including Bitcoin packages in their distribution?

When Bitcoin  does implode, whether it is next week or in 10 years, could it impact the reputation of other open source initiatives and people promoting geeky innovation?

What would be the criteria for an open source project, such as a Linux distribution, to include or exclude a particular Cryptocurrency?

I started putting some of my observations in blog posts, this one begins to cover the relationship with open source phenomena

Debian Developer
https://danielpocock.com

TimKelly

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
  • Karma: +4/-3
    • View Profile
Re: Open source aspirations of credibility exploited to legitimize Bitcoin
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2026, 06:35:13 am »

I started putting some of my observations in blog posts, this one begins to cover the relationship with open source phenomena

I don't have a comment overall, but I find it ironic that very early on in his post, Daniel posts an 2011 email from the debian-private mailing list in which Philip Hands says "Likewise IANAL, but as I understand it, if one does not defend a trademark, one risks losing it."

A reminder to the readers that after Daniel had been expelled from Debian and stripped of his developer status, he registered multiple domains with "debian" in them, forcing Debian to file suit against Daniel to defend their trademark (Daniel was ordered to turn over the domains).  Daniel states Debian has spent $120,000 in legal fees as a result of his actions.