Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - tle

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 39
1
Applications and Porting / [DEV] JIT support for Firefox
« on: April 22, 2026, 10:59:24 pm »
Firstly, all credits go to @ClassicHasClass for his great JIT support work for the v86 Firefox (basically baseline JIT is fully working). He had submitted the patches against upstream at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1860412 but unfortunately the patch has become stale and no longer work with post-140ESR codebase.

So after spending 3 weeks with help from few people in the PPC community and help of AI agents to track down errors pattern (lacking of tooling like rr-debugger made the work super hard - at one stage I was resolving to all sort of blind hypothesis and nearly gave up), I have successfully revived and fixed number of bugs of the original JIT codes. Please check out https://github.com/runlevel5/firefox/pull/1 to all members here for reviewing.

TL;DR; LE path for POWER8 and POWER9 is fully implemented (including ION JIT, WASM SIMD, JSPI and Simulator). The BE path is still in progress atm. Please give JIT work a go and let me know if you happen to find any bug. I have tried my best to hand test and ran many stress test / benchmarks and have addressed quite a number of edge cases.

So what's next? Trying to get it polished as much as possible then get it upstreamed (for release 153 - why? new ESR would be branched off this version) or simply try to get the patch accepted in downstream sources like Fedora, Debian/Ubuntu.

2
Applications and Porting / Re: [DEV] LuaJIT PPC64 support
« on: April 22, 2026, 09:13:46 pm »
It's painful to convince Mike to review and merge such huge delta of changes to support PPC64 JIT. It's understandable taking into consideration and assumption that Mike does not own a POWER8/9 hardware.

I think I could try to review one of those stale JIT work and get it patched downstream in Fedora. If that approach proves successful, I strongly believe Mike would likely give his blessing to the JIT port after few years of real world usage downstream.

3
Operating Systems and Porting / Re: [NEWS] Linux 7.0
« on: April 12, 2026, 07:49:16 pm »
I've just manually built the kernel for Fedora 44 (as of now Fedora has not yet, likely they are going to stick to 6.19 for the F44 release). So far no issue, everything just work for me. Having said that I do not run DB, web server or NAS on the blackbird system so I could not verify if there are regressions to those applications

4
Operating Systems and Porting / [NEWS] Linux 7.0
« on: April 12, 2026, 06:20:30 pm »
More information: https://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges

Key highlights from the Linux 7.0 changelog include:

File Systems:

* XFS: Introduction of autonomous self-healing capabilities.
* EXT4: Enhanced performance for concurrent direct I/O writes.
* Performance & Memory:
* Faster swap mechanisms.
* Improved memory reclamation for file caches.
* Standardized generic I/O handling.

Architecture & Security:

* Intel TSX optimizations.
* Quantum-resistant kernel module signing.

Language Support:

* The Rust language experiment is considered complete and is now a core, non-experimental part of the kernel.

Hardware Support:

*General improvements and support for new hardware devices


POWERPC
kdump: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation
powernv: Enable cpuidle state detection for POWER11
book3s64: Hash / SLB fixes & improvements (cover)
smp: Expose die_id and die_cpumask



5
Applications and Porting / Re: Little Snitch for Linux!
« on: April 11, 2026, 11:07:15 pm »
Isn't it the popular firewall for OSX? I fondly remember then it was quite good

6
I am going to try to make his JIT work run again on the newer version - still in progress. I will NOT touch the WASM in this work

ref: https://github.com/runlevel5/firefox/pull/1

READY for testing:

* Ion JIT
* WASM
* WASM SIMD
* POWER9 Optimization

Basically it is on par with ARM64 backend



7
Applications and Porting / Re: RustiCL on Fedora 39
« on: March 30, 2026, 05:47:25 pm »
It's been awhile, perhaps you should give it another a go

https://www.phoronix.com/news/RadeonSI-Modern-CL-Conformance

8
Another progress with supporting NaCl sandboxing feature

https://github.com/DaemonEngine/Daemon/pull/1946

That is to use box64 emulation

9
You are right, the game is indeed not CPU bound. It's not clear to me if OldUnreal team has any plan to add Vulkan renderer for UT2004.

10
I guess let's wait for UT2004 v3374 released first then we could try to convince OldUnreal team to do the same for UT99 and UTGOLD

11
It's HERE FOLKS! Please grab Preview17 version https://github.com/OldUnreal/UT2004Patches/releases/tag/3374-preview-17

Great thanks to Tim and OldUnreal team for the enormous efforts to get this great game supported

12
Operating Systems and Porting / Re: [BUG] Linux 7.0-rc1
« on: March 26, 2026, 08:56:29 pm »
is the issue finally resolved? Or you simply revert those ppc changes in your own downstream patch?

13
FYI the game could be played easily after disabling NaCL sandboxing (which does not support POWER btw)

https://github.com/DaemonEngine/Daemon/pull/1945

14
ref: https://chimera-linux.org/news/2026/03/retiring-powerpc.html

Maintaining support for Little Endian is already hard enough. I can understand q66's decision. I personally has no particular softwares that would benefit greatly from BE.

15
Operating Systems and Porting / A bootloader in Rust
« on: March 18, 2026, 09:28:38 am »
I just randomly bump into this interesting project https://siliconislandblog.wordpress.com/2026/03/18/booting-with-rust-chapter-3/

We all have been using grub for boot loader so to see yet another project trying to address shortcomings of grub is definitely intriguing.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 39