Author Topic: Fedora Linux Thread  (Read 28076 times)

ClassicHasClass

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 471
  • Karma: +37/-0
  • Talospace Earth Orbit
    • View Profile
    • Floodgap
Re: Fedora Linux Thread
« Reply #45 on: February 12, 2020, 01:23:52 pm »
What does ls -l /dev/ipmi0 look like? On this system,

Code: [Select]
% ls -l /dev/ipmi0
crw-rw----. 1 root ipmi 239, 0 Feb  5 09:05 /dev/ipmi0

I think you have the groups right, but either your udev rule is wrong or it hasn't taken effect yet.

MPC7500

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 592
  • Karma: +41/-1
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Fedora Linux Thread
« Reply #46 on: February 12, 2020, 04:07:19 pm »
Code: [Select]
$ ls -l /dev/ipmi0
crw-r-----. 1 root ipmi 241, 0  5. Feb 18:05 /dev/ipmi0

Code: [Select]
$ cat /etc/udev/rules.d/99_my.rules
# allow ipmi to be seen by ipmi group
KERNEL=="ipmi*", GROUP="ipmi", MODE="0640"

Code: [Select]
chgrp ipmi /dev/ipmi0

Code: [Select]
chmod 0640 /dev/ipmi0

What have I done wrong and how do I correct the permissions?

ClassicHasClass

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 471
  • Karma: +37/-0
  • Talospace Earth Orbit
    • View Profile
    • Floodgap
Re: Fedora Linux Thread
« Reply #47 on: February 12, 2020, 09:59:47 pm »
Oh, my bad. Yes, it does need to be writeable to send the commands to the BMC. Try 0660 instead of 0640. I wasn't thinking there.

MPC7500

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 592
  • Karma: +41/-1
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Fedora Linux Thread
« Reply #48 on: February 13, 2020, 09:18:55 am »
Thanks, that's it :-)

For future revisions:
Link between IPMI fan 0/1/2 and mainboard fan connectors

ClassicHasClass

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 471
  • Karma: +37/-0
  • Talospace Earth Orbit
    • View Profile
    • Floodgap
Re: Fedora Linux Thread
« Reply #49 on: February 13, 2020, 09:05:02 pm »
Yes, but I don't know if that mapping applies for the T2. IPMI reports six fans on this machine. I haven't sat down to figure out which are which.

Incidentally, what is the CPU monitor tool you're using there? I like the clockspeed display.

MPC7500

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 592
  • Karma: +41/-1
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Fedora Linux Thread
« Reply #50 on: February 13, 2020, 09:18:00 pm »
Yes, the mapping is for the Blackbird only.
I'm using cpufreq.

MPC7500

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 592
  • Karma: +41/-1
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Fedora Linux Thread
« Reply #51 on: February 14, 2020, 09:19:29 am »
It is a pity that cpufreq does not distinguish between physical cores and threads. Then it would be possible to switch off single cores and you could also switch between SMT1, 2 and 4.

MauryG5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 773
  • Karma: +22/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Fedora Linux Thread
« Reply #52 on: February 15, 2020, 07:29:53 am »
Guys finally fixed the Fedora Software application problem. In recent updates have sent the fix to the problem.

MPC7500

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 592
  • Karma: +41/-1
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Fedora Linux Thread
« Reply #53 on: March 04, 2020, 07:42:17 am »
Which repository have I to enable to get Kernel 5.6?

I currently have a problem with the 8x PCIe slot. There is a NVMe adopter (with Corsair MP600) in this slot and I get the error:
Code: [Select]
nvme nvme0: frozen state error detected, reset. 
Removing after probe failure status: -19.
can't change power state from D3hot to D0 (config space inaccessible)

I guess this could be a kernel problem?
This error only occurs if the 16x slot is used (RX5500XT).

Has anyone an idea how to locate the error?

Edit: Here I found someone with a similar issue.
His conclusion in the last post: Mainboard change to a different model.
« Last Edit: March 04, 2020, 08:13:53 am by MPC7500 »

MPC7500

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 592
  • Karma: +41/-1
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Fedora Linux Thread
« Reply #54 on: March 04, 2020, 02:14:01 pm »
One further quwestion, I'm following this guide: Installing Kernel

When I perform: sudo make INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 -j`nproc` install, I get this:
Code: [Select]
  LDS     arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.lds
  WRAP    arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.pseries
  WRAP    arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.epapr
sh -x ./arch/powerpc/boot/install.sh "5.6.0-rc3+" vmlinux System.map "/boot"
+ set -e
+ '[' -x /root/bin/installkernel ']'
+ '[' -x /sbin/installkernel ']'
++ basename vmlinux
+ image_name=vmlinux
+ '[' -f /boot/vmlinux ']'
+ mv /boot/vmlinux /boot/vmlinux.old
+ '[' -f /boot/System.map ']'
+ mv /boot/System.map /boot/System.old
+ cat vmlinux
+ cp System.map /boot/System.map
+ path=/boot
+ shift 4
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'

Instead of this:
Code: [Select]
  LDS     arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.lds
  WRAP    arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.pseries
  WRAP    arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.epapr
sh -x ./arch/powerpc/boot/install.sh "5.6.0-rc3+" vmlinux System.map "/boot"
+ set -e
+ '[' -x /root/bin/installkernel ']'
+ '[' -x /sbin/installkernel ']'
+ exec /sbin/installkernel 5.6.0-rc3+ vmlinux System.map /boot

What's my error?

MauryG5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 773
  • Karma: +22/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Fedora Linux Thread
« Reply #55 on: March 06, 2020, 09:18:26 am »
but sorry, this 5500 XT graphics card, can you make it work with the same patch as the 5.5.0.rc1 kernel that we installed some time ago? I know that is for ships 10 and this is ships 14 ... How do you make it work let me understand ...

MPC7500

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 592
  • Karma: +41/-1
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Fedora Linux Thread
« Reply #56 on: March 07, 2020, 06:22:00 pm »
It's the same patch. Because Navi 14 and Navi 10 are almost the same GPUs.

MauryG5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 773
  • Karma: +22/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Fedora Linux Thread
« Reply #57 on: March 08, 2020, 03:51:21 am »
Got it all clear. And why did you decide to install Kernel 5.6? The patch is then provided by default in these new Kernels or should we always install it ourselves?

MPC7500

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 592
  • Karma: +41/-1
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Fedora Linux Thread
« Reply #58 on: March 08, 2020, 07:18:46 am »
Yes, I thought the patch is applied to Kernel 5.6. But with Kernel 5.6 it doesn't work.

MauryG5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 773
  • Karma: +22/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Fedora Linux Thread
« Reply #59 on: March 08, 2020, 08:10:34 am »
So I think you should wait now. In fact, I have not yet understood what will happen with the new Kernels regarding the operation of Navi10 / 14 because obviously we must always be able to use the graphics cards otherwise it doesn't make sense ... I am currently doing very well and I hold on to 5.5.0.rc1 with patches, then when they give me guarantees of being able to use new Kernels that support Navi10 / 14 then I will be happy to install the new Kernels.