I have absolutely no doubt that his comments at the time drove off people who disagreed with him and supported the real victims, the very young girls that were recruited for Epstein.
His comment was actually cut in half and then replayed to people out of context.
When you look at the full email that RMS wrote about the situation, he had acknowledge earlier in the same paragraph that the women were under a coercive influence.
Sadly, the whole Internet works like that today, people are quoted out of context and then mailing lists are censored so that people can't correct things. It happens over and over again.
Congruently, mentors who express support for RMS based on his contributions to the GNU operating systems and ecosystem are also likely to drive off the people whose needs are being addressed by DEI initiatives.
People were not only expressing support based on his contributions. People express support based on the presumption of innocence. People have a misunderstanding in their job and they have a beer together with their colleagues and they clarify the situation and move on. In these online communities, there are certain people who want the power to have something akin to capital punishment, to completely destroy people.
Perhaps that is where Debian failed, and has a 70 to 1 male to female ratio?
We can't say they failed because we don't actually know what their goal was. It was something like "
GNOME has this internship thing, we should do it too"
Perhaps, Daniel, you could help Debian by investigating the causes of the 70 to 1 male to female ratio, examine the demographic profile of the people who got to choose the people that developed the program, and to seek out pro bono help from DEI experts who might be able offer professional-level management of such a program.
There are some clues about the problem.
Look at the men working alone at their computers without pay.
Diana von Bidder wrote an email about it after her husband died on our wedding day. "I was glad that he was not only sitting alone in front of his computer"
There is some evidence that women are more inclined to be productive in social environments whereas men are comfortable working for extended periods alone. Things like this may be a factor in how men and women spend their free time.
Therefore, rather than spending money to mentor and manipulate women to behave more like men, the objective of diversity may be more achievable if the way we work is overhauled.
A lot of genuine female developers also have social and economic pressure, for example, women's salaries are lower so they can't pay for a trip to a conference. How many female developers can spend their vacation at DebConf if their boyfriend or husband is not interested in Debian too? These social expectations are never really discussed.
But maybe women have a sixth sense for
the problems with the Debian culture and they simply stay away from groups like this.