Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
General Discussion / Re: Is Raptor Computing Systems still open for business?
« Last post by markr87 on March 17, 2025, 05:37:58 pm »
My first attempt to contact RCS was December 1st of 2024.  They finally responded on the evening of February 28th asking to verify my shipping address.  I responded the following day.  I have heard nothing since.  I have been longing for the next iteration of Power goodness from this company, but if this is how they treat their paying customers I think I am going to pass.
92
Applications and Porting / Re: [DEV] Using Java's Vector API on PPC64LE
« Last post by tle on March 17, 2025, 06:47:27 am »
Thanks  :)

If you have any suggestions for future Java on PPC64LE videos please feel free to share - my youtube feed feels devoid of content at times :(

I think getting GraalVM to support PPC64LE would be endless source of content.
93
Applications and Porting / Re: [DEV] Using Java's Vector API on PPC64LE
« Last post by ClassicHasClass on March 16, 2025, 03:01:21 pm »
Very nicely done.
94
Applications and Porting / Re: [DEV] Using Java's Vector API on PPC64LE
« Last post by icbts on March 16, 2025, 06:55:36 am »
Thanks  :)

If you have any suggestions for future Java on PPC64LE videos please feel free to share - my youtube feed feels devoid of content at times :(
95
Compiler explorer is a cool tool, not sure if it has the features you're looking for though.
96
Haven't heard of this yet but maybe some stuff has leaked from the NDA partners.
97
This is going to sound like a flippant response and it really isn't, but pretty much any debugger would do (I use gdb but lldb should handle it also). You could throw an __asm__("trap\n") in your code and you'll drop into the debugger at that point, from which you can single step and look at the registers as you go along.
98
Applications and Porting / Re: [DEV] Using Java's Vector API on PPC64LE
« Last post by tle on March 16, 2025, 12:08:09 am »
Awesome work! I have not touched Java Vector API at work but your work peak my interests.
99
I am learning PowerPC assembly by playing around with assembly inlined in C code. Wondering is there any interactive tool that shows the full list of registers and other useful information for assembly language? Many thanks in advance
100
General Discussion / POWER11, "Cirrus+" Can any of this be substantiated?
« Last post by Borley on March 15, 2025, 08:28:10 pm »
From a speculative write up on big data processor roadmaps:



Quote
Just for fun, and to show what a different world it is that Big Blue operates in, we added the Power and z processors to the middle of the Arm pack. We expect “Cirrus+” Power11 and “Telum II” z17 processors before the end of this year to boost the performance of the Power Systems and System z mainframe lines. The Power11 chip, which we will cover shortly, is all about increasing memory bandwidth and memory capacity compared to the Power10 chip the has been in the field for nearly four years now. The z17 processor has a bunch of tweaks, including an integrated DPU to speed up I/O operations for mainframes, which we covered back in August 2024. Both of these chips are etched by Samsung, IBM’s processor fab partner, and both have sixteen cores on a socket and are implemented in machines that have four sockets in a node, four nodes in a single system image, and tens of terabytes of main memory hanging off of them.

Big iron is truly different.

I'll admit to not having been paying attention to things after IBM mucked up with nonfree memory controllers, but was surprised to see sixteen cores being referenced. Despite other material suggesting 25% more cores as compared to POWER10 (which was also configured with 16 cores).
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]