Water Cooler > General OpenPOWER Discussion
POWER11 on the horizon?
ClassicHasClass:
I haven't seen nor heard anything myself.
MPC7500:
--- Quote ---Introducing IBM Power11 processor
With a planned release in 2025, the next generation IBM Power11 system will have innovations in the processor, system, and stack levels to help enterprises propel digital transformation initiatives for their mission-critical infrastructure
--- End quote ---
IBM Newsroom, November 13, 2024
The longer the S1 is waiting, the more convinced I am that the S1 is a Power11 derivative.
ejfluhr:
Video interview with Bill Starke, current chief architect for Power CPUs, here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9S_w_Bj3oo
Interesting points:
- Power11 is evolutionary from Power10 architecture
- Core is same POWER ISA version as Power10, will run faster -> presume that means higher frequencies
- more cores active than Power10
- future CPU after Power11, neither confirmed nor denied as Power12, will be chiplet architecture similar to AMD because that was deemed better for scaling up to 16-socket computer
- continued use of OMI memory now and into the future due to performance and RAS benefits
It doesn't look like Power11 will be any different than Power10 as far as open computing goes.
Here's hoping that S1 succeeds...
ClassicHasClass:
The OMI part, for sure, and we're all hoping we get direct-attach RAM out of S1 (or there is an option for direct-attach RAM). But I hope they got the Synopsys IP out of there too.
lepidotos:
I can't see Raptor not wanting direct-attach RAM so they can try to maximize their sales of the new gen, I know I'd be less interested in S1 if I had to also buy the memory off them and I imagine most people would be; I kept hearing price as being the reason a lot of people didn't pick up Talos II or Blackbird I and that's with as much standard PC parts as they had. As much as I want to support them, I don't know if I want to support them enough to spend $900 on 32 GB of DDR5 because it's in a different form factor. I know SoSi is supposed to be a different company, but considering Raptor is probably their biggest partner and use case (if I was a company, I don't think I'd trust Solid Silicon based on their website alone), I don't imagine it's not a priority.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version